Taxpayer-funded think tank backs votes for 16s

Why are we being charged for this blatantly left-wing outfit?

“Giving 16-year-olds the vote is a big step toward rebuilding trust and bringing more people into the process”, posted the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) today.

Its Executive Director, Harry Quilter-Pinner, was on GB News arguing in favour of lowering the voting age. You can watch the full clip below or by clicking this link:

Subscribe to get access to in-depth research and resources.

Taxpayers will be delighted to know they were charged £285,500 (2020-24) for the IPPR, which describes itself as “the UK’s leading progressive think tank”:

You can find out my reasons for objecting to its taxpayer funding in this piece…

… including the fact it:

In general it’s quite shocking to see how many left-wing think tanks taxpayers are charged for.

Many taxpayers don’t want votes at 16. We should not be charged for a think tank lobbying for this change.


You can see a full list of IPPR’s funders here. 2024 sources of income include:

  • £450,001 – £500,000* from the Open Society Foundations

  • £75,001 – £100,000 from Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors

  • £100,001 – £125,000 from Unbound Philanthropy, which also funds City of Sanctuary UK and Hope Not Hate Charitable Trust.

*denotes multi-year funding

More Articles

Charlotte Gill
20 December 2025

Mike Bloomberg has been running training schools for world mayors

Tracy Brabin has attended at least two of his courses
Charlotte Gill
17 December 2025

The organisations that are fuelling open borders in Britain

We need to combat the charity sector to secure our borders
Charlotte Gill
17 December 2025

Foreign interference hypocrisy: Keir Starmer lets US billionaire Mike Bloomberg train UK mayors

The Prime Minister is in no position to launch an investigation into foreign interference
Charlotte Gill
17 December 2025

Is London turning into the new San Francisco?

How politicians quietly imported the US Democrats' "Sanctuary Cities" - with predictably dangerous consequences for the UK